Mark-sf

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 294 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Best vintage amp? #32603
    Mark-sf
    BRONZE Member
      • Topics Started 0
      • Total Posts 294

      The tweeter section is on one side of the woofer section, so you ca place a stereo pair with them on the inside or outside as they are mirrored. If doubling up I would have each channel in a WTTW configuration and angled at the listener as you’d want to stay on axis.

      in reply to: Tips for adjusting BG4000 platter height #32419
      Mark-sf
      BRONZE Member
        • Topics Started 0
        • Total Posts 294

        The damping cylinder only slows lowering. Raising should be quick. You can turn it more to slow it further. It simply won’t lower if too much.

        in reply to: Tips for adjusting BG4000 platter height #32373
        Mark-sf
        BRONZE Member
          • Topics Started 0
          • Total Posts 294

          The screw in the black bottom of the damping cylinder controls the rate of descent.

          in reply to: Tips for adjusting BG4000 platter height #32332
          Mark-sf
          BRONZE Member
            • Topics Started 0
            • Total Posts 294

            I have seen the braided cable rise up out of the curved channel as approaching the spindle if it is twisted. Also the bearing height is adjustable. The brass bearing is threaded and with a large locking nut on top. However, that rarely ever is the problem.

            in reply to: BeoGram 5005 tonearm too low #32243
            Mark-sf
            BRONZE Member
              • Topics Started 0
              • Total Posts 294

              I believe that bearing is part of the arm assembly and is not available separately. You will need to replace the entire are or find a parts unit. Most B&O tonearms were a single part number.

              in reply to: BeoGram 5005 tonearm too low #32235
              Mark-sf
              BRONZE Member
                • Topics Started 0
                • Total Posts 294

                Relooking at it the second pin may be there. However, if you had an issue with the knife-edge bearing B not being there, the arm would not work at all. It’s possible the are was not properly refitted. Try following these steps precisely again:

                IMG_1021

                in reply to: BeoGram 5005 tonearm too low #32219
                Mark-sf
                BRONZE Member
                  • Topics Started 0
                  • Total Posts 294

                  Your picture of Part 1110, Holder, appears to be missing a rear piece S that sticks up and may have snapped off. The only solution would be to find a replacement.

                  in reply to: BeoGram 5005 tonearm too low #32122
                  Mark-sf
                  BRONZE Member
                    • Topics Started 0
                    • Total Posts 294

                    The spring is responsible for restoring the arm to its rest position. It appears you can move it to the proper level with your finger; therefore, it appears the spring has lost tension or was switched with one of the other springs. You should be able to confirm that by pressing on the spring’s top connection. The other possibility is that the counterweight is too far forward which for the tracking weight calibration. Ensure that when the tracking force know is at 0 that the arm floats when in Play mode.

                    in reply to: BeoGram 5005 tonearm too low #32104
                    Mark-sf
                    BRONZE Member
                      • Topics Started 0
                      • Total Posts 294

                      Screw B is the one that you use to align the tonearm with the sensor arm. Also spring 1107 does not appear to be attached at the top in your photo.

                      in reply to: Beogram rx question #31927
                      Mark-sf
                      BRONZE Member
                        • Topics Started 0
                        • Total Posts 294

                        It may be that the mute switch needs cleaning. If you try cleaning the stylus when it is at rest and hear anything then the mute switch is not making good contact.

                        in reply to: Best vintage amp? #31637
                        Mark-sf
                        BRONZE Member
                          • Topics Started 0
                          • Total Posts 294

                          Doubling up speakers that were not designed to be is tricky as it can create interference effects which will result in uneven response and dispersion. If I were to attempt it I would place them so that each sides’ tweeters are in the center as close to each other as possible (pairing opposing channels). This will result in a narrower listening window but will double your dynamics.

                          in reply to: Beomaster 7000 Humming Sound #31636
                          Mark-sf
                          BRONZE Member
                            • Topics Started 0
                            • Total Posts 294

                            You haven’t mentioned which country version you have, but since both components have two-pin AC plugs, I would start by testing them in the same wall outlet without a power strip and flipping one plug if possible to see it the hum lessons. When you do this ensure that no other connection goes to either component including antenna cable. It is quite possible that it is a crossed ground or phase issue when the units are plugged into different outlets. Also a cable antenna or TV connection that has a CATV connection can introduce hum. This test will let you narrow it down.

                            in reply to: Connecting Beogram 4002 to Beosound Core #31620
                            Mark-sf
                            BRONZE Member
                              • Topics Started 0
                              • Total Posts 294

                              Sound quality will be more a function of the cartridge and speakers you are using versus the preamp. To get an internal one you’ll need to spend around $400 where a decent external one can be had for $100+.

                              in reply to: Best vintage amp? #31561
                              Mark-sf
                              BRONZE Member
                                • Topics Started 0
                                • Total Posts 294

                                I can’t comfortably comment on how sonically different they were even though I worked for a dealer while both were in production. Obviously, the 4400 was their top of the line at its time a was replaced by the 5000 series during the 7700’s time. Both had similar discrete Class AB amps. If you want to read about the design I can suggest no better resource than it Owners Manual: https://beomanuals.com/manuals/Beomaster/Beomaster%204400/Bang-Olufsen-Beomaster_4400-Owners-Manual.pdf. While you obviously don’t push your Maggies that hard, sometimes you don’t know what you are missing till you hear them with a more authoritative amp. In my case I was using Sony’s venerable TAN-5550 VFET amp which was a great match as it was conservatively rated and I beefed up its power supply.

                                in reply to: Best vintage amp? #31472
                                Mark-sf
                                BRONZE Member
                                  • Topics Started 0
                                  • Total Posts 294

                                  If by first generation, you mean MG-1’s then they are 4-ohm speakers and you will find significantly better dynamics from the 4400 as it has a more powerful and capable amp section – 75w vs 30w in 7700. I never had the MG-1 but dit have the MG-2 and they definitely needed the power for good bass response.

                                  in reply to: Beogram 5500 – buzzing issue #30950
                                  Mark-sf
                                  BRONZE Member
                                    • Topics Started 0
                                    • Total Posts 294

                                    If you have the original phono DIN cable marked with a PH then B&O used to have DIN->RCA adaptor that had an external ground wire which is needed. If you can find that then a special internally grounded one such as https://soundsheavenly.com/beogram-record-players/14-2244-beogram-to-non-bo-device-as-used-on-beogram-4000c-phono-pre-amp-receiver-amplifier-etc-bo-ref-6271348.html#/2-length-1m/60-grounding-internal_ground_link will work.

                                    in reply to: Beogram 5500 – buzzing issue #30919
                                    Mark-sf
                                    BRONZE Member
                                      • Topics Started 0
                                      • Total Posts 294

                                      You mention a preamp but don’t mention which one and whether you are using the proper Phone DIN cable to it. This cable has double screening and is a requirement to prevent hum and buzz.

                                      in reply to: Beogram 4002/4004 RIAA/Remote control Upgrade :) #30607
                                      Mark-sf
                                      BRONZE Member
                                        • Topics Started 0
                                        • Total Posts 294

                                        I suspected as much. I did not choose that route as I wanted the higher head room and direct coupling to avoid caps in the direct signal path,

                                        in reply to: Connecting Beogram 4002 to Beosound Core #30606
                                        Mark-sf
                                        BRONZE Member
                                          • Topics Started 0
                                          • Total Posts 294

                                          FYI, you are not limited to an internal phono preamp if you have trouble finding one. You can use and inexpensive Project Box or Schiit Mani and actually get better sound.

                                          in reply to: CX100’s Resto-Mod #30578
                                          Mark-sf
                                          BRONZE Member
                                            • Topics Started 0
                                            • Total Posts 294

                                            Great progress! I would measure the woofers as the doped cones will likely change the parameters causing a crossover modification.

                                          Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 294 total)